SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 95

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Kamakhya Narain Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. In the, suit out of which P. A. No. 33 of 1949 arises the plaintiff, namely, Raja Bahadur Kamakhya Narain Singh; asked for a declaration that the provisions of the Bihar Private Forest Act (Bihar Act 3 of 1946) are illegal and ultra vires. The plaintiff alleged that in exercise of the powers conferred by that Act the State of Bihar. had issued a notification expressing their intention of constituting the notified forests belonging to the plaintiff as a private forest under the said Bihar Act 3 of 1946 and had taken over the management of the notified forests.

The case of the plaintiff was that all the provisions of Bihar Act 3 of 1946 and the notifications issued by the State Government were illegal and ultra, vires of Sec.299, Government of India Act, 1935. The plaintiff claimed two main reliefs: (1) that the Court may grant a declaration that Bihar Act 3 of 1946 was ultra vires, and (2) that the Court may grant an injunction restraining the State Government, its servants and Agents from taking over the management of the notified forests.

The suit was contested by the State of Bihar and on 30-9-1948, the Additional subordinate Judge of Hazaribagh came to the conclusion

























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top