SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 14

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI, BANERJI
Fulo Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Banerji, J.

1. This revision has been referred to the Full Bench in order to consider whether the appellate Court can, in exercise of its power under Sec. 423, Sub-section (1), Clause (b) of the Criminal P. C., alter the finding of the trial court so as to convert an acquittal into conviction.

2. A few facts are necessary to be stated. There was an occurrence on 1-8-51 resulting in the petitioners being charged lor assault and noting under Sections 323 and 147, Penal Code, respectively. The trying Magistrate convicted the petitioners under Sec.323, Penal Code, and fined them Rs. 50.00 each. He recorded an order of discharge under Sec.147, Penal Code, on an erroneous view of the procedure.

He should have acquitted them under that sec-Lion, and it will be assumed for the purpose of this case that the petitioners wore acquitted under Sec.147, Penal Code. The petitioners then appealed. The appellate Court acquitted one appellant under Sec.323, Penal Code, and maintained the conviction of three under the same section. As regards three others, they were acquitted under Sec.323, Penal Code, but convicted under Sec.147, Penal Code, under which section they had been acquitted by the

















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top