SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 32

K.SAHAI, RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Udit Narayan Singh – Appellant
Versus
Ramrup Singh – Respondent


Judgment

1. This application under Sec. 417 (3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure for special leave to appeal against an order of acquittal arises in the following circumstances :

The petitioner applied before the Sub-Divisional Officer under Sec. 69 of the Bihar Tenancy Act for division of crops standing in some bhaoli lands. The Sub-Divisional Officer appointed a mukhtear as pleader -- Commissioner to divide the crops. The Commissioner reported that the opposite party obstructed him in dividing the crops. The petitioner then filed an application before the Sub-Divisional Officer, praying that he should file a complaint against the opposite party under Sec.195 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The Sub-Divisional Officer, after satisfying himself, filed a complaint against the opposite party for an offence under Sec.186 of the Penal Code. The opposite party were accordingly put upon their trial and the trial Court convicted them of that offence. On appeal, however, the learned Sessions Judge of Monghyr has acquitted the opposite party.

2. Quite clearly, the complaint in this case was filed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Sub-section (3) of Sec. 417 runs as follows:

"If such an order







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top