SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1956 Supreme(Pat) 24

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Mahindra Singh – Appellant
Versus
Chander Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. These two second appeals arise out of two appeals preferred before the Court of appeal below, and have been heard together with the consent of the parties, as they arise out of one and the same suit.

2. S. A. 730 of 1950 is by the plaintiffs, arising out of Title Appeal 83/6 of 1948/50, preferred by defendant 5 in the matter of cost only, which was allowed by the Court of appeal below, and the decree for cost awarded against defendant 5 was set aside. S. A. 771 of 1950 is also by the plaintiffs arising out of Title Appeal 91 of 1948, allowed by the Court of appeal below, reversing the decision of the first Court, and dismissing the plaintiffs suit.

3. The facts material for determination of the present appeals may briefly be stated thus: The suit, out of which the present appeals arise, was originally instituted by Mr. M. Nunawati on 27-1-45 as plaintiff No. 1 for recovery of possession of the disputed properties, of which the last male-holder was Awadh Behari Singh, who died in Chait 1349 Ps., corresponding to the year 1942. The plaintiffs case was that Awadh Behari, her brother, died issueless, and she was his sole surviving sister, out of his fo






















































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top