SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 17

V.RAMASWAMI, RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Sugauli Sugar Works Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Cane Commissioner – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This rule laises an interesting point as to the right of the Cane Commissioner to issue an order declaring a reserved area for the supply of cane to the factory as required by Sec.15(1), Bihar Sugar Factories Control Act, 1937 (Bihar Act VII of 1937), read with Rule 24(1) of the Bihar Sugar Factories Control Rules, 1938, made by the State Government by virtue of the powers vested in them under Sec.30 of the Act.

2. In this case, the petitioner is a private Limited Company, and, id has a sugar factory at Sugauli in the district of Champaran. It has obtained a rule from the High Court, on an application under Articles 223 and 227 of the Constitution, for a writ, in the nature of certiorari, against the opposite party to call up and quash the order of the Cane Commissioner, Bihar, dated 28-7-1956, purporting to have been issued under Rule 24-A(1) of the Rules, which is annexure G to the application. The petitioner has also asked for a writ in the nature of prohibition, refraining the opposite party from giving effect to the impugned order.

3. Opposite Party 1, who is the Cane Commissioner, Bihar, and, opposite party 3, who is the State of Bihar, have












































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top