V.RAMASWAMI, RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Sugauli Sugar Works Private Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Cane Commissioner – Respondent
Raj Kishore Prasad, J.
1. This rule laises an interesting point as to the right of the Cane Commissioner to issue an order declaring a reserved area for the supply of cane to the factory as required by Sec.15(1), Bihar Sugar Factories Control Act, 1937 (Bihar Act VII of 1937), read with Rule 24(1) of the Bihar Sugar Factories Control Rules, 1938, made by the State Government by virtue of the powers vested in them under Sec.30 of the Act.
2. In this case, the petitioner is a private Limited Company, and, id has a sugar factory at Sugauli in the district of Champaran. It has obtained a rule from the High Court, on an application under Articles 223 and 227 of the Constitution, for a writ, in the nature of certiorari, against the opposite party to call up and quash the order of the Cane Commissioner, Bihar, dated 28-7-1956, purporting to have been issued under Rule 24-A(1) of the Rules, which is annexure G to the application. The petitioner has also asked for a writ in the nature of prohibition, refraining the opposite party from giving effect to the impugned order.
3. Opposite Party 1, who is the Cane Commissioner, Bihar, and, opposite party 3, who is the State of Bihar, have
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.