SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 216

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
Lady Dorothy Lort Williams – Appellant
Versus
Uditandu Prakash Mullick – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. The petitioner has moved this Court, under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution, for an appropriate writ to quash the order, passed under Sec. 5 of the Bihar Buildings (Lease, Bent and Eviction) Control Act, 1947 (Bihar Act III of 3947), hereafter referred to as "the Act", of the Controller dated 22-9-1955 (Annexure D to the application), and, the subsequent orders passed on appeal by the Deputy Commissioner, Ranchi, on 3-5-1956 (Annexure E), and, on revision by the Commissioner of Chotanagpur Division on 12-11-1956 (Annexure F) upholding the order of the Controller dated 22-9-1956 (Annexure D).

2. On the above application of the petitioner, a rule was issued by this Court against the opposite party to show cause why the aforesaid orders should not be quashed.

3. Cause has been shown by Mr. Bay Paras-nath, Government Pleader, on behalf of the opposite party. The petitioner is the owner of a holding which she has let out to opposite party 1, oa a monthly rental of Rs. 700/-. The opposite party 1 is running a hotel called "Grand Hotel" in this holding. The tenant, opposite party 1., made an application under Sec. 5 of the Act for determination of










































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top