SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 214

PATNA HIGH COURT
K.Sahai and Choudhary JJ.
Krishna Nandan Prasad Verma
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Revision No. 473 of 1955 ;
Decided On : NOVEMBER 01, 1957

A confession is admissible in evidence if it is made voluntarily and is not induced by any threat or promise.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL BREACH OF TRUST - Confession - Admissibility - Corroboration - Evidence Act (1 of 1872), Secs. 24, 35, 63 (3), 65 (g).

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a clerk in a hospital, was convicted of criminal breach of trust in respect of a sum of Rs. 2,672/8/-. He had confessed to the crime before the Civil Surgeon and other witnesses, and this confession was corroborated by other evidence.

Finding of the Court:

The Court held that the confession was admissible in evidence and that it had been materially corroborated. The Court also held that the petitioner had committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the amount alleged.

Issues: 1. Whether the confession was admissible in evidence. 2. Whether the confession had been materially corroborated. 3. Whether the petitioner had committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the amount alleged.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. The confession was admissible in evidence because it was made voluntarily and was not induced by any threat or promise. 2. The confession had been materially corroborated by other evidence, including the fact that the petitioner had continued to perform the same functions during the period in charge as he had previously, and that he had distributed to the doctors their shares out of the collection made by the nurses. 3. The petitioner had committed criminal breach of trust in respect of the amount alleged.

Final Decision: The Court dismissed the petitioner's application for revision.

Judgment

Sahai, J.

1. The petitioner has been convicted under Sec. 409 of the Penal Code and has been sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two years and also to pay a fine of Rs. 2,000 or, in default, to undergo further rigorous imprisonment for one year.

2. The facts, which have either been admitted or have been found by the courts below to be proved and which are not in dispute any longer, are as follows: The petitioner was employed as the only clerk (called head clerk) in the office of Lady Elgin Zenana Hospital (hereinafter to be referred to as the hospital) at Gaya from before August, 1951, up to the 23rd January, 1953, when he was not under suspension. As clerk, he was in charge of correspondence, office work, accounts, deposits and withdrawals of money, etc.

He used to write the cash book and collection register, to prepare chalans for deposit of money in the treasury and to prepare bills for withdrawal of money from the treasury. The hospital was previously managed by a committee; but it was provincialised, that is to say, its management was taken over by the State Government, in 1949. It was directly in charge of a Lady Superintendent; but its administrative head was the Civil Surgeon. Dr. T.K. Sundaram (P.W. 1) was the Lady Superintendent of the hospital from the 17th July, 1951, onwards, and Dr. S. Prasad (P.W. 13) was the Civil Surgeon of Gaya from May, 1952.

3. Sources of income of the hospital included rent from paying wards and side rooms as well as charges for confinements and operations. The system was that the senior nurse, for the time being, took a receipt book from the petitioner, realised charges payable from paying patients, issued receipts to these patients, and, at intervals of two to four days, handed over the money collected by her to the petitioner.

The nurse concerned as well as the petitioner made endorsements on the back of the last counterfoil of receipt issued by the nurse to the effect that the money collected by the nurse had been paid to, and received by, the petitioner. When one receipt book was exhausted, the senior nurse returned the book containing the counterfoils to the petitioner who issued a fresh receipt book to her. The nurse concerned used to make necessary entries in the paying patients register showing the names of patients and the amount and nature of realisations from each of them.

The nurses who have been examined as Prosecution witnesses in this case are P. Ws 2, 7 and 17. P.W. 2 made entries in the paying patients register from the 18th April to the 8th September, 1951 and again from the 14th November 1951, to the 26th April, 1952, as she was in charge of collections during these periods, P.W. 7 made entries from the 9th September 1951, to the 24th October, 1951 and P.W. 17 made entries from the 28th April to the 28th July, 1952, when they were in charge of the collections.

The petitioner, on the other hand, used to enter in the cash book the amounts which he received from the nurses, excluding the share of such receipts which was to be paid to doctors (i.e., the Lady Superintendent and other physicians) and to enter in exercise books (exhibits 7 and 7/a), called doctors fee books, the shares of receipts which were payable to the doctors. In the collection register, the petitioner used to enter the amounts collected from the hospital under different heads and to note the chalan numbers under which different sums had been deposited in the treasury.

4. On the 23rd January, 1953, an Assistant Accounts Officer named Mr. R.N. prasad (P.W. 3) and a senior auditor named Mr. C. Prasad (P.W. 21), accompanied by another auditor, came to the office of the hospital with the permission of the Civil Surgeon (P. W. 13) and started making a surprise audit of the accounts in the presence and with the assistance of the petitioner. They found several defects in the accounts and they spoke to Dr. Sundaram (P. W. 1) about it, asking her to inform the Civil Surgeon.

She, accordingly, ga





































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top