SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 81

PATNA HIGH COURT
Misra and Banerji JJ.
State Of Bihar
Versus
Ranen Nath
Government Appeal No. 20 of 1953 ;
Decided On : MARCH 22, 1957

The words "instigates" and "incites" in Section 27 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 should be read to signify something deeper than a mere asking of a person to do a particular act. There must be something in the nature of solicitation to constitute instigation or incitement.

Headnote:

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 - SECTION 27 - INCITEMENT AND INSTIGATION - MEANING AND SCOPE - EVIDENCE REQUIRED TO ESTABLISH CHARGE.

Fact of the Case:

The Patna Electric Supply Company and its workers had a dispute, which was referred to an Industrial Tribunal. During the pendency of the dispute, the workers went on a token strike for 24 hours. The State Government filed a complaint against the respondents, who were members of the Union, alleging that they had instigated or incited the workers to take part in the strike, thereby making themselves liable for penalty under Section 27 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the prosecution had failed to prove any act on the part of the respondents which would make them liable under Section 27 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found that the evidence merely pointed out that the respondents participated in a meeting where it was resolved to stage a token strike, that some of them exhorted the workers to join the strike, and that they actually did strike on the date fixed. However, the court found that there was nothing in the evidence to show that the respondents had instigated or incited the workers to take part in the strike.

Issues: Whether the respondents had instigated or incited the workers of the Company to take part in the strike and, accordingly, made themselves liable for the penalty under Sec.27 of the Industrial Disputes Act.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the words "instigates" and "incites" should be read to signify something deeper than a mere asking of a person to do a particular act. There must be something in the nature of solicitation to constitute instigation or incitement under Sec.27 of the Industrial Disputes Act. The court found that the evidence did not show that the respondents had done anything more than ask the workers to join the strike, and that this did not amount to instigation or incitement.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appeal and acquitted the respondents.

Judgment

Banerji, J.

1. This appeal is on behalf of the State against an order of acquittal, dated 23rd of September, 1953 passed by Mr. S.C. Gupta, Judicial Magistrate, 1st Class, Patna.

2. It is not necessary to state the facts in detail as the same has been done in Government Appeal No. 19 of 1953 which arose out of the same facts and which was heard along with the present one.

3. Shortly, it may be stated here that a dispute arose between the management of the Patna Electric Supply Company and their workmen, and this dispute was referred by the Government to an Industrial Tribunal in March 1952. The employees serving under the Company had a Union known as the Patna Electric Supply Workers Union and respondent Sri Raman Roy was its President and respondent Sri Damodar Jha was its general Secretary. The dispute, which was referred to Tribunal, was still pending, when, in November 1952, there was further dispute relating to allotment of quarters followed by a disturbance in presence of Sri R.N. Sharma, Assistant Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer, in consequence of which Mr. A.V. Ramaswami, Chief Engineer of the Company, suspended several workers who were members of the Union. After this, Mr. Ramaswami (P. W, 1) received a notice from the Union intimating him that the workers were going to stage a token strike for 24 hours from 8 A. M. on 29th November, 1952, to 8 A. M. on 30th November, 1952. The intimation was made through a letter written by the General Secretary, Mr. Damodar Jha, P. W. 1 and the Government of Bihar in the Labour Department wrote to the Union that the strike would be illegal, but the strike was actually launched on the date and at the lime fixed by the Union.

4. Thereafter, the State Government decided to file a complaint against the persons who had joined in the strike. Mr. R.N. Sharma, the Assistant Labour Commissioner and Conciliation Officer, filed the complaint against the present respondents on the authority of the Government, stating all the facts therein. In the present matter the prosecution case was that the respondents did various acts in furtherance of the alleged illegal strike. Under the column "offence committed", it was stated as follows :

"Instigation and incitement to workmen of the Patna Electric Supply Company Ltd. Patna to take part in an illegal strike or otherwise acting in furtherance thereof punishable under Sec.27 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947)."

5. The learned Judicial Magistrate held :

1. There was an illegal lock-out.

2. The strike cannot be held to be illegal.

3. There was no necessity to discuss the merit of evidence on the aforesaid findings.

4. The prosecution had not been able to bring home the charge against the accused persons beyond all reasonable doubt.

5A. The learned Judicial Magistrate, accordingly, acquitted the respondents, and the Government, thereafter, preferred this appeal.

6 It is not necessary to traverse the very same grounds which has been done in Government Appeal No. 19 of 1953. It has been held there that there was no lock-out of the workers of the Company and the Strike was an illegal one.

7. The only point to be decided in this appeal is whether the respondents had instigated or incited the workmen of the Company to take part in the strike and, accordingly, made themselves liable for the penalty under Sec.27 of the Industrial Disputes Act.

8. In the petition of complaint, it was stated on behalf of the prosecution as follows :

1. An extraordinary meeting of the Patna Electric Supply Workers Union was held on 25th November, 1952, at which the Executive Committee resolved to launch 24 hours token strike from a. m. on 29th November, 1952, to 8 a. m. on 30th November, 1952 unless the Company fulfilled certain demands.

2. On 27th November, 1952, a meeting of the workers of the Patna Electric Supply Company was held under the Presidentship of Sri Gurbachansingh, Vice President of the Patna Electric Supply Workers Union. At this m
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top