SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 201

AHMAD
Sheikh Habibulla – Appellant
Versus
Jamuna Singh – Respondent


Judgment

Ahmad, J.

1. The rule in this case has been issued at the instance of the defendant-petitioner calling upon the plaintiffs and some of the defendants, who constitute the opposite party, to show cause why the order dated 10th April 1956, passed by the trial Court holding that the defence of the defendants is barred on the principle of res judicata be not set aside.

2. The conflict here between the parties substantially centres round the question of title and possession as to five annas and four pies milkiat interest in village Tilberia, bearing touzi No. 1474 in the district of Saran. Originally two suits had been instituted in that regard. The first was by the defendant-petitioner and that was in the first Court of Munsif, Siwan, bearing Title Suit No. 43 of 1951. Therein the relief sought was for the declaration of title land confirmation of possession over that property. The other, namely, Partition Suit No. 38 of 1952, which has given rise to this application, was instituted by the present plaintiffs-opposite party and that was in the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Chapra. Therein the relief sought was one for partition of that share, namely, five annas and four pies, o



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top