Choudhary, J.

1. This application in -revision arises out of an arbitration proceeding without the intervention of the Court. The facts leading to the institution of the proceeding, put shortly, are these. There was a dispute between the petitioner and opposite party No. 1 with regard to survey plot No. 3926 which, admittedly, belonged to the petitioner. He, however, gave this plot in exchange to one Sribans who, in his own turn, exchanged the same with opposite party No. 1, Thereafter, opposite party No. 1 built, a house on the said plot, and, subsequently, dispossessed Sribans from the land which he had given to him in exchange for the above plot. Consequently, Sribans dispossessed the petitioner from the land which he had given to him in ex-change of that plot. As a result of this, there were several criminal cases between the parties. During the pendency of these cases, it appears the dispute between the parties with regard to land was amicably settled and in consequence of the settlement four sale deeds were executed on 16-11-1951, one by the petitioner in favour of Sribans with respect to the said plot No. 3926, the other by Sribans to opposite party No. 1 with regard