SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 166

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD, V.RAMASWAMI
S. M. Khalil – Appellant
Versus
Akhauri Sitaram – Respondent


Judgment

1. In Civil Revision No. 874 of 1956, the petitioner S. M. Khalil has obtained a rule from the High Court against the order of the Munsif of Patna, dated 20th August, 1956, requiring the petitioner to deposit rent under Sec.11-A of the Bihar Act 3 of 1947 (as amended) at the rate of Rs. 100.00 per month from September 1955 to March 1956.

2. In Civil Revision No. 995 of 1956, the plaintiff-landlord, Akhauri Sitaram, has obtained a rule against that portion of the order of the Munsif of Patna, dated 20th August, 1956, rejecting the prayer of the petitioner requiring the defendant-tenant to deposit rent in Court from April 1954 to August 1955.

3. In Civil Revision No. 874 of 1956, the argument put forward on behalf of the petitioner is that the Munsif committed an error of law in requiring the petitioner-defendant to deposit rent at the rate of Rs. 100.00 per month for the period in question. It was submitted that the rent of the house was at first Rs. 26/-per month and that the rent was increased to Rs. 70.00 on 15th of January, 1948, and later on the rent was increased to Rs. 100.00 per month. This position was disputed on behalf of the landlord and it was contended on his b






Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top