SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1957 Supreme(Pat) 127

C.P.SINHA
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Tulshi Ram – Respondent


Judgment

C.P.Sinha, J.

1. These three applications have been filed by the defendants in the three suits giving rise to these applications. The point that falls to be decided in these cases is as to whether the court-fee paid is sufficient or not.

2. In 1945, certain land acquisition proceedings were started for acquisition of lands in Sindri. There was a notification under Sec. 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, which was followed by one under Sec. 6 of the Act, and some buildings started to be constructed on these lands. In January, 1951, there was another notification under Sec. 6 of the Act regarding portions of the lands which had formed subject-matter of the previous acquisition and some other lands also. An award was made in each case under Sections 11 and 12 of the Land Acquisition Act. In the suit giving rise to Civil Revision No. 384, the award of the Land Acquisition Officer amounted to Rs. 474/6/-; in the suit giving rise to Civil Revision No. 385, the award was for Rs. 284/10/-; and in the suit out of which Civil Revision No. 386 arises, the award was to the extent of Rs. 1,107/13/3. Thereafter, there were applications under Sec.18 of the Land Acquisition Act for reference t

















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top