SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Pat) 140

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI
Mt. Pulwa – Appellant
Versus
Brijnandan Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

1. It appears in this case that the plaintiffs brought a title suit for a declaration of title and recovery of possession of certain properties and also for mesne profits. The suit was decreed by the Additional Munsif of Monghyr on 29-6-1946, and subsequently his decree was affirmed by the district Judge and by the High Court. The plaintiff-decree-holders then filed an execution Case No. 139 of 1949 for recovery of possession, but an objection was filed by one Wali Mohammad who claimed to have purchased the property already at a court sale. The objection was allowed under Order 21, Rule 58, Code of Civil Procedure, and thereafter a suit appears to have been filed in accordance with Order 21, Rule 63. Code of Civil Procedure. The plaintiffs then filed an application for ascertainment of mesne profits. The defendants raised several objections, but these objections were overruled by the learned Munsif and it was held by the learned Munsif that the plaintiffs were entitled to mesne profits till the date of dispossession, namely, from 30-5-1940 till the year 1948. An appeal was taken against this order of the Munsif by the defendants and it has been held by the lower appellate C










Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top