SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Pat) 147

PATNA HIGH COURT
S.C.Misra and U.N.Sinha JJ.
Basudeo Gir
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 200 of 1957 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 24, 1958

The court held that the evidence of the footprint expert was admissible under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act and that this evidence, along with the testimony of the victim, was sufficient to convict the appellant.

Headnote:

CRIMINAL LAW - EVIDENCE - FOOT-PRINT - ADMISSIBILITY - SECTION 45 OF THE INDIAN EVIDENCE ACT - INTERPRETATION - EXPERT EVIDENCE - VALUE - FOOT-PRINT ON GRAMOPHONE RECORD - CORROBORATION BY ADMISSION OF ACCUSED - CONVICTION UPHELD.

Fact of the Case:

Appellant Basudeo Gir was convicted under Section 397 of the Indian Penal Code for dacoity. The prosecution alleged that the appellant, along with others, had robbed the house of Ramkishun Ram and caused him injuries. The main evidence against the appellant was the testimony of Ramkishun Ram and the footprint found on a gramophone record in the appellant's house.

Finding of the Court:

The court held that the evidence of the footprint expert was admissible under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act, which allows for expert evidence on matters of science or art. The court found that the footprint on the gramophone record matched the appellant's footprint, and that this evidence, along with the testimony of Ramkishun Ram, was sufficient to convict the appellant.

Issues: 1. Whether the evidence of the footprint expert was admissible under Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act. 2. Whether the footprint on the gramophone record matched the appellant's footprint. 3. Whether the evidence was sufficient to convict the appellant.

Ratio Decidendi: 1. Section 45 of the Indian Evidence Act allows for expert evidence on matters of science or art. The court held that the science of footprint identification is a valid field of expertise and that the evidence of the footprint expert was therefore admissible. 2. The court found that the footprint on the gramophone record matched the appellant's footprint based on the testimony of the footprint expert and the appellant's admission that he had been made to give his footprint on the gramophone record by the investigating officer. 3. The court held that the evidence of the footprint expert, along with the testimony of Ramkishun Ram, was sufficient to convict the appellant.

Final Decision: The court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld the conviction.

Judgment

Misra, J.

1. Appellant Basudeo Gir alias Basudeo Gossain has been convicted under Section 397, Indian Penal Code, by the learned Judicial Commissioner of Chotanagpur, Daltonganj, and sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment for seven years. He was tried along with one Arjun Kamar who has charged under Sec.395, Indian Penal Code, but was acquitted. It was alleged on behalf of the prosecution that Ramkishun Ram (P.W. 1) of village Loharsi was changing his dhoti for lungi after his night meal in his house between 8-30 and 9 P. M., on the 5th of July, 1956, when he heard some sound outside.

He turned back to see what it was when he was given two lathi blows on his head by someone. He took up a danta and moved forward to defend himself. Then he saw 5-6 men standing immediately out of the entrance door of his house. One of them was the appellant Basudeo Gossain who had a gun in his hand. The others had lathis and torches. He could recognise Basudeo Gossain in the light of the torch flashed by some of the dacoits, Basudeo Gossain immediately fired at him and he was hit in his right leg. He hurried into his house followed by 5 or 6 men who caught him.

Two of them were recognised as the persons from whom he had purchased bullock at Sous Bazar. After giving further details with regard to the figure of the dacoits, he stated further that one of the dacoits demanded key from him and he said that it was with his wife. His wife was also given a danta blow and she threw away the key with which they entered into the kotha ghar of Ramkishun. One of them came out and asked Ramkishun where he had kept the other sums of money. He said that whatever he had was kept in the box in the kotha ghar. That man gave him 5-6 more lathi blows as a result of which he fainted and fell down.

2. Ramkishun had three brothers, Balo, Ranglal and Thakur Chand. Ramkishun carried on a wine-shop in the western side verandah of his house. His brother Balo had a wine-shop at Chandwa and his brother Thakur Chand is a Police Sub-Inspector. The residential house of Ramkishun (P. W. 1) has the main room known as kotha ghar surrounded by verandahs on all sides, known as dhabas. Ramkishun remained unconscious for 3-4 hours and when he regained bosh in the morning he saw his brother Balo by his side. He asked him how he was. He said that anyhow his life was saved. He asked him fur her if he recognised the dacoits. His answer was that he had recognised two or three of them; two of them well enough but one of them slightly.

It appears that while he was still unconscious his wife sent some men of the village to Chandwa to call Balo from there, who reached there in the morning. Balo put him on a khatoli and took him to the police station at Chandwa where the party reached at 9 A.M. First information report was accordingly lodged there on his statement. He mentioned therein that a sum of Rs. 840.00 in cash besides clothes, three saris, three dhotis, umbrellas, chadder etc., were stolen. He also mentioned therein the name of Basudeo Gossain, the appellant, as one of the culprits.

3. The officer-in-charge of the Chandwa police station after having recorded the first information report examined Ramkishun and the other persons from the village who had accompanied him. He left for the place of occurrence at 12 Oclock and arrived at the village at 3 P.M. on the same day. He inspected the house of Ramkishun and found things scattered here and there; papers were thrown about. But the investigating officer knew that the Inspector of Police had received some special training in the scientific detection of crimes, so that he did not touch nor did he allow anyone to touch anything in the room. Only he scraped some blood from near the entrance door and prepared a sketch map. He examined Ramkishuns wife. He then proceeded to the house of Basudeo Gir which he searched in his presence at 5-30 P.M. He recovered a pistol (exhibit XXX). He recovered two round lead balls (exhibits XXXI and X























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top