SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Pat) 33

N.L.UNTWALIA, C.P.SINHA
Babu Badri Singh – Appellant
Versus
Babu Ram Kishore Prasad Singh – Respondent


Judgment

N.L.Untwalia, J.

1. This appeal arises out of a suit for partition. The appeal was filed by defendants Nos. 1-14. An application has been filed by appellants 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10, who were respectively defendants Nos 2, 3, 7, 8, 9 and 10 in the Court below, praying that they maybe transposed to the category of respondents for the reasons stated in the application. There seems to be no objection to this and the hearing of the appeal has proceeded on the basis that the said appellants are now in the category of respondents.

2. The plaintiff-respondents first party filed the suit in question in the Court of the Subordinate Judge at Darbhanga for partition of touzi No. 4896, khewat No. 3 in patti khalispur original and khewat No. 7/1 in patti Harlochanpur dependency. The share of the plaintiffs and defendants 1 to 21 was -/14/-annas, 19 gandas and odd which was entered in khewat No. 3 and the remaining one anna and odd share belonged to defendants Nos. 22-30 and was separately entered in khewat No. 3/2, and, they were impleaded as defendants second party in the suit.

The said share of one anna and odd is not the subject-matter of this suit. The plaintiffs and defendants first a



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top