SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1958 Supreme(Pat) 64

V.RAMASWAMI, R.K.CHOUDHARY
Debnath Bhagat – Appellant
Versus
Bhoju Mandal – Respondent


Judgment

R.K.Choudhary, J.

1. The only question which arises in this appeal is whether the document which is the subject-matter of the suit out of which the present appeal arises is a mortgage by conditional sale or a sale out and out with a condition of repurchase.

2. The plaintiffs-respondents executed a registered sudhbarna bond on the 1st of March 1923, in favour of the defendants-appellants for a sum of Rs. 1600 giving 13.17 acres of land in sudbharna. It appears that the defendants could not get possession over the sudbharna land as a result of which they demanded the payment of the mortgage money. On the 23rd of February 1924, therefore, the plaintiffs executed the document in question in favour of the defendants transferring 12.6 acres of land out of the above 13.17 acres of sudbharna land for a sum of Rs. 2800. It is contended on behalf of the plaintiffs that this document of transfer is a mortgage by conditional sale, and they have, therefore, instituted a suit for redemption. On the other hand, the case of the defendants is that it was a sale out and out with a condition of repurchase and as the time fixed for repurchase had expired, the plaintiffs were not entitled to an




























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top