SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Pat) 157

K.SAHAI
Shah Jamilur Rahman – Appellant
Versus
Abdul Aziz – Respondent


Judgment

K.Sahai, J.

1. This application by the first party is directed against a final order passed in a proceeding under Sec.145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure in respect of 58.48 acres, equivalent to 93 Bighas 11 ka-thas 7 dhurs of land. I will refrain from mentioning the respective claims of the three parties involved in this case except for such part of their claim as becomes necessary to mention. I will also refrain from referring to the merits of the parties cases because I feel, after hearing both the parties, that this is a case which should be remanded.

2. Appearing on behalf of the first party-petitioners, the first point which Dr. Sultan Ahmad has taken is that the appointment of a pleader commissioner in this case by the Magistrate was illegal and that, in any case, the pleader commissioners report should not have been considered inasmuch as it was not legally put in evidence on being formally proved in accordance with law. In my judgment there is no substance in this point. Dr. Sultan Ahmad has drawn my attention to sec. 148 of the Code of Criminal Procedure which provides that the District Magistrate or the Sub-divisional Magistrate may depute any magistrate subord



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top