SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Pat) 57

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Munshi Banesh Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Jalpa Shankar Varma – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiffs is from the order of the court below rejecting their application for ascertainment of mesne profits on the ground that there was no direction in the decree for any such enquiry. There was no direction either in the judgment, or in the decree for ascertainment of mesne profits.

2. The original plaintiff, Akhauri Nandkishore Lal alias Nandu Lal, who, after his death, was substituted by the present plaintiff, Munshi Banesh Prasad, instituted a suit for possession and mesne profits. In paragraph 29 of the plaint, amongst the reliefs claimed by the then plaintiff, was relief No. 3, which was to the following effect:

"A decree may be passed in favour of the plaintiff against the defendants for the future mesne profits from the date of institution of the suit till the delivery of possession, on the receipt of additional court-fee."

3. This suit was instituted on the 13th February, 1943. The suit was, however, dismissed 011 the 17th May, 1943, and, ultimately the matter came up in second appeal to this Court--Second Appeal No. 1502 of 1956--at the instance of the present plaintiffs-appellants. The appeal was disposed of by V.






















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top