SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Pat) 89

V.RAMASWAMI, KANHAIYA SINGH
Satyadeo Narain Lal – Appellant
Versus
Municipal Commissioners – Respondent


Judgment

Kanhaiya Singh, J.

1. These are two applications under Sec.25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act against the decisions of the Small Cause Court Judge decreeing two suits of the Bhagalpur Municipality for recovery of municipal tax in respect of two holdings. Defendants Nos. 1 to 3 are the landlords of these holdings and defendant No. 4 is the tenant under them. The landlords did not enter appearance, though duly served. Defendant No. 4 alone contested the suits. His defence was that the landlords were the owners of the holdings and were recorded in the Assessment List and the Demand Register, that he was a mere occupier and not an owner of the holdings and was never assessed with tax, nor was any demand made upon him and that he was, therefore, not at all liable to pay the taxes claimed in the two suits.

2. The learned Small Cause Judge overruled the defence and decreed the suits ex parte against defendants Nos. 1 to 3 and on contest against defendant No. 4. Now, the latter has come up to this Court in revision.

3. The facts as admitted by the witnesses for the municipality, about which there is now no longer any controversy, are these : The two holdings consist of cul
























Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top