SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1959 Supreme(Pat) 92

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI
Lakhuram Hariram – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this case the petitioner has brought a money suit in the Court of the Munsif, 1st Court, Chapra, against the opposite party for realising a sum of Rs. 2520 and odd, being the value of goods which were not delivered out of a particular consignment. In paragraph 5 of the plaint the petitioner alleged that notices under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act and Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code had been sent to the opposite party per registered post on the 5th of June, 1950. The suit was contested by the opposite party on the ground that notices under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act and Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code had not been served.

During the trial of the suit the petitioner made an application on the 3rd of November, 1954, praying that the opposite party should be called upon to produce the register in which there were entries regarding receipt of notice and letters. The opposite party filed a rejoinder on the 23rd November, 1954, that no such register was maintained. Later on, on the 6th of January 1956, the petitioner made an application to the trial Court to the effect that they had come to know that a fife No. NCS/338/CPR of 1951 was maintai
















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top