SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 177

R.K.CHOUDHARY, V.RAMASWAMI
Sudhansu Kumar Ghose – Appellant
Versus
Land Acquisition Officer – Respondent


Judgment

1. In Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 586 of 1959 the case of the petitioner is that he had purchased 3 kathas 3 dhurs of land in village Lohanipur, comprised in plot No. 295, khata No. 200, tauzi No. 387, and forming Colony Plot No. 96, at a cost of Rs. 3150.00 from Syed Anwar Hussain and his co-sharers by a registered sale-deed dated 23-5-1955, for the purpose of constructing a house. It appears that by a notification dated 2-2-1957, published in the Bihar Gazette, the State Government declared that the land of the petitioner along with other lands were intended to be acquired for a public purpose, namely, for construction of low-income-group houses by the Peoples Co-operative House Construction Society, Patna.

On 9-11-1957, the petitioner filed a claim before the Land Acquisition Officer for compensation for the acquisition of the land in question. The claim petition was heard, and on 20-10-1958, the Land Acquisition Officer made an award under Sec.11 of the Land Acquisition Act and the compensation payable to the petitioner was determined to be Rs. 3586/28 nP.

A notice of the award was given to the petitioner on 1-5-1959, but the Land Acquisition Officer instead of maki












Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top