SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 185

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI
Prahlad Prasad Mahrotra – Appellant
Versus
Thakur Prasad Mehra And Company – Respondent


Judgment

1. In this case the respondent, Thakur Prasad Mehra and Company, obtained a decree against the appellant, Prahalad Prasad Mahrotra, in Suit No. 3540 of 1949 in the Calcutta High Court in its Ordinary Original Civil Jurisdiction. The decree was transferred to the Muzaffarpur Court for execution on the 24th August, 1955. On the 24th February, 1956, a notice was issued by the Muzaffarpur Court under Order 21, Rule 52, Code of Civil Procedure. On the 15th March, 1956, the execution Case was dismissed for default. But on the 15th January, 1957, the decree-holder again applied to the Muzaffarpur Court for execution of the decree.

It was objected by the Judgment-debtor that the Muzaffarpur Court had no jurisdiction to execute the decree because the Muzaffarpur Court had communicated the result of the previous execution to the Calcutta High Court on the 16th March, 1956. The contention of the Judgment-debtor was that under Section 41 of the Code of Civil Procedure the Muzaffarpur Court had sent a certificate to the Calcutta High Court about the result of the execution and hence the Muzaffarpur Court had no jurisdiction to entertain a fresh application for execution of the same decr







Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top