Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. These five applications, in revision, by Skh. Kafiluddin, a judgment-debtor, who is now dead, arise out of an equal number of application made under Order 21, Rule 90, Code of Civil Procedure, not by him but by Nurul Haq, one of the other two judgment-debtors, who is opposite party 4 in this Court, in each of the five execution cases, for setting aside the sales of different properties in each case.

2. What happened was this : One Jinat Ali had two sons, Nasiruddin, husband of Mt. Pano, opposite party 5, and Kafiluddin, the original petitioner before this Court, on whose death, his heirs have been substituted as petitioners. Nasiruddin had two sons, Abclul Haq, opposite parly 3, and Nurul Haq, opposite party 4. Abdul Haq had a son Sayeed Akhtar, who is the decree holder-opposite pary 2. Sayeed Akhtar obtained five decrees against his father, Abdul Haq, his uncle, Nurut Haq, the applicant for setting aside the sales, and grand-uncle, Kafiluddin, the original petitioner, for arrears of rent in respect of five different holdings, Those decrees were executed separately and different properties were put to sale for realisation of the decretal amounts.

3