SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 210

KANHAIYA SINGH, V.RAMASWAMI
Mst. Habiba Khatoon – Appellant
Versus
Nawab Lal – Respondent


Judgment

1. The question of law arising in this case is whether the defendant is entitled to rely upon an award of arbitrators (Ext. C) dated the 7th April, 1948, in support of his defence though the award was not filed in court under Sec.14 of the Arbitration Act and no decree was granted in terms of the award under the provisions of Sec.17 of the same Act. It was argued on behalf of the defendant-appellant that the lower appellate Court was erroneous in holding that the award cannot be taken into evidence, nor can it be set up by the defendant in support of his own case.

In support of this argument learned Counsel relied upon a decision of a Division Bench of this High Court in Government of India V/s. Jamunadhar Rungta, AIR 1960 Pat 19, consisting of Rai and S. C. Prasad, JJ. holding that the existence of an arbitration agreement or award may be set up as a bar in defence to a suit based on the original cause of action arising out of rights and titles which formed the subject matter of such an agreement or award The learned Judges constituting the Division Bench proceeded upon the view that Sec.32 of the Arbitration Act only barred a suit involving a decision upon the existence,








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top