SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 188

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Bhagwan Lal – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This application, in revision, under Sec.25 of the Provincial Small Cause Courts Act, is by the plaintiff, from the judgment of the Court below dismissing his suit because of the alleged non-compliance of Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. The facts are these : On 24-6-1957, 111 bags of fresh and green Mosammi were consigned under Railway Receipt No. 7269/63, and, 2 boxes of fresh and green Anars were booked under Railway Receipt No. 7269/65, from Nasik Road for delivery to the plaintiffs firm at Chapra. These two consignments were not delivered to the plaintiff, and, therefore, he brought a suit for damages for nondelivery of the two consignments, against the defendants Railway Companies.

3. Notices under Section 80 of the Code were served on the Railway Companies concerned, as will appear from Exhibits A and A/1. By mistake, however, in the notice under Section 80 of the Code, with regard to 11 bags of Mosammis, the Railway Receipt No., which was mentioned therein, was 7209/65. which was the railway receipt of the consignment of the two baskets of Anars, instead of 7269/63, which was in respect of the consignment of the Mosammis. Simil



































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top