N.L.UNTWALIA
Chandrika Singh – Appellant
Versus
Parsidh Narayan Singh – Respondent
N.L.Untwalia, J.
1. The petitioners suit was dismissed on the 20th September 1957 under Order 9, Rule 3, Civil Procedure Code, as neither he nor anybody on behalf of the defendants responded to the call for hearing of the case. Thereafter he filed an application under Order 9, Rule 4 for its restoration. That application also was dismissed for default on the 3rd December 1957. Thereafter the petitioner put in an application under Sec.151 of the Code for restoration of the miscellaneous case No. 57 of 1957 which was filed under Order 9, Rule 4. This application has been dismissed by the learned Munsif on the ground that the application under Sec.151 is not maintainable. No facts in support of this application have been investigated.
The application has been dismissed by placing reliance upon Ramghulam Singh V/s. Sheodeonarain Singh, 4 Pat LJ 287 : (AIR 1922 Pat 121). The view expressed in this case has been reiterated in a recent Full Bench decision of this Court in Doma Choudhary V/s. Ram Naresh Lal, 1958 Pat LR 413 : (AIR 1959 Pat 121), but the point of distinction, which has been rightly pointed out to me by Mr. U. C. Sharma appearing in support of this application, is th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.