SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1960 Supreme(Pat) 13

R.K.CHOUDHARY, AHMAD, U.N.SINHA
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Ram Ballabh Das Jalan – Respondent


Judgment

R.K.Choudhary, J.

1. In the suit, out of which the present appeal arises, the plaintiff appellant, the State of Bihar, claimed to recover a sum of Rs. 42,926-3-8 from the defendants as being partners of the firm Rum-ballabh Motilal dealing in foodgrains. According to the case of the plaintiff the said firm entered into various contracts for purchase of Government stocks of foodgrains etc., and had also supplied foodgrains to the Regional Grain Supply Officer, Gaya as purchasing agents on behalf of the said authority. In pursuance of the above contracts, the defendants purchased various quantities of foodgrains from the plaintiff on different dates the price of which had been realised in full except in respect of two items, namely, (1) the purchase of 10,500 maunds of rice under agreement dated 13-3-1945, and (2) the purchase at auction sale of 58,916 empty bags on 3-3-1945.

The total price of 10,500 maunds of rice amounted to Rs. 1,08,846-14-0, out of which a sum of Rs. 81,773-15-9 was paid by the defendants to the plaintiff, and the balance of Rs. 26,072-14-3 remained unpaid. The total price of 58916 empty bags amounted to Rs. 18,853-2-0, out of which Rs. 10,000.00 had bee













































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top