1. In the suits out of which these appeals arise the plaintiff alleged that he obtained a registered lease of the land in dispute from the Sasaram Municipality who is defendant No, 2 by a registered document dated the 20th October, 1944. The plaintiff thereafter inducted the principal defendant of each suit in the suit land and the houses which the plaintiff had constructed after taking settlement from the Sasaram Municipality. The plaintiff brought the suits against the principal defendants for a declaration that his lease with the Sasaram Municipality is still subsisting find the plaintiff is entitled to realise rent from the respective principal defendants. Both the lower courts dismissed the suits brought by the plaintiff, principally on the ground that the title of the plaintiff has been existinguished by forfeiture of the lease and the plaintiff had, therefore, no right to realise rent from the principal defendant of each suit.

2. In support of all these appeals the main contention put forward by the learned Government Advocate is that in view of the provisions of Sec.111(g) of the Transfer of Property Act there should be a notice in writing given by the Sasaram Munic