SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Pat) 95

RAJ KISHORE PRASAD
Kapuri Kuer – Appellant
Versus
Sham Narain Prasad – Respondent


Judgment

Raj Kishore Prasad, J.

1. This appeal, by the plaintiff, from a judgment of affirmance, involves the interpretation of the will, Ext. 2.

2. The circumstances, leading up to the present appeal, are these. The admitted pedigree, of the deceased testator, Churaman is as below:-

-


Churaman

D.1927

Wives

|

__________________________________

| |

Murti Kuer died issueless Lilo Kuer died

on 17-5-1928 on 3-7-1958

|

__________________________

| |

daughter son

| |

_________________________ |

| | Deonarain

Jageshwar Kuer Kapuri Kuer D.1914

D.1942 Plff. W=Radhe

|





















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top