SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Pat) 80

H.MAHAPATRA, TARKESHWAR NATH
Dhyan Singh And Another, Plaintiffs – Appellant
Versus
Chandradip Singh And Others, Defendants – Respondent


Judgment

MAHAPATRA, J.

1. The appellants brought a suit on the 7th of January, 1950, for a declaration that they had perpetual mukarrari interest in the property in suit described in Schedule 1 of the plaint, and that they were entitled to get the property which was in the custody of the Sub-divisional Officer, Barh, after the same was attached under Sec. 146 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The property involved in the suit was 16.35 acres in village Berna Gossain Nath, Pargana Pillich, thana Buktiarpur in the district of Patna.

2. The plaintiffs are the members of a Hindu joint family governed by the Mitakshara School of which the plaintiff No. 1 is the karta. One Baldeogir was impleaded originally as defendant No. 6, but he was expunged by an order of the Court at the instance of the plaintiffs on the 10th of January, 1951; so also another defendant No. 8, Mt. Deolagan Devi, was expunged. No relief was sought particularly against defendant No. 7. We are thus left with defendants 1 to 5 who were parties to a proceeding under S. 145, Criminal Procedure Code, as against the plaintiff. The plaintiffs case was that Baldeogir was the absolute owner of the rent free lands in khata Nos



















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top