SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1961 Supreme(Pat) 49

N.L.UNTWALIA, V.RAMASWAMI
Gaumont Kali Private Ltd. Co. – Appellant
Versus
Badri Prasad Jaiswal – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is brought on behalf of the defendant against an order of the 2nd Subordinate Judge of Arrah, dated the 12th November, 1959, in Title Suit No. 30 of 1959, granting a temporary injunction to the plaintiff restraining the defendant from executing a decree in Execution Case No. 16 of 1959.

2. It appears that in 1956 there was a hire-purchase agreement with regard to certain machineries for running a cinema between the parties, and the total price of the cinema equipment-was fixed at Rs. 35,129/-, out of which the plaintiff-respondent paid a sum of Rs. 6876/- in certain instalments. On account of the default of the plaintiff, the defendant bought a title suit, namely Title Suit No. 265 of 1958, in the Bombay High Court, to enforce the terms of the hire-purchase agreement. The suit was heard ex parte, and on the 23rd September, 1958, the Bombay High Court granted a decree in favour of the defendant for recovery of possession of the machineries from the plaintiff and also for recovery of the balance of the money due upon the hire-purchase agreement. The decree was executed by the defendant in the Court of the Subordinate Judge of Arrah in Execution Case No. 16 of 1





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top