SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1962 Supreme(Pat) 80

N.L.UNTWALIA, V.RAMASWAMI
Mosafir Mahton – Appellant
Versus
Bachani – Respondent


Judgment

1. This appeal is brought on behalf of the decree-holder against the order of the Additional Subordinate Judge, Chapra, dated the 28th September, 1959, by which the order of the Munsif of Chapra dated the 26th May, 1959, exempting an area of 17 kathas 16 dhurs of the land of the judgment-debtor under the provisions of Sec.15 of the Bihar Money-Lenders Act, has been up-held.

2. The main point taken by the appellant is that the order of the lower appellate court dismissing the appeal on merits is ultra vires because the appellant did not appear in court on the date the appeal was called on for hearing, and under the provisions of Order XLI, rule 17 of the Code of Civil procedure the only course open to the appellate court was either to adjourn the case or to dismiss the appeal ex parte. In our opinion, the argument of learned counsel is well-founded and must be accepted as correct. Order XLI, Rule 17, Civil Procedure Code, -is to the following effect:

"17. (1) Where on the day fixed, or on any other day to which the hearing may be adjourned, the appellant does not appear when the appeal is called on for hearing, the court may make an order that the appeal be dismissed.

(2) Wh

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top