SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Pat) 101

V.RAMASWAMI, N.L.UNTWALIA
Mahesh Prasad Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Manjay Lal – Respondent


Judgment

N.L.Untwalia, J.

1. The petitioner has obtained a rule from this Court against the respondents to show cause why the order dated the 10th September, 1962, passed by the 4th respondent, the Member, Election Tribunal, Patna, in Election Petition No. 149 of 1962, filed by respondent No. 1 for setting aside the election of the petitioner as a member of the Bihar Legislative Assembly, be not quashed in exercise of the powers of this Court under Article 226 or 227 of the Constitution of India, and why the said Tribunal be not prohibited from recording and admitting any evidence in relation to the said election petition bearing on the question of any corrupt practice alleged to have been committed by the petitioner or his election agents. Cause has been shown on behalf of respondent No. 1.

2. Two issues were argued and pressed before the Election Tribunal on behalf of the petitioner for decision as preliminary points before proceeding with the hearing of the election petition. The said issues are

"No. 1 : Are the petition and the annexures thereto properly verified? No. 2 : Has the petitioner filed with his petition an affidavit in the prescribed form as laid down in the proviso t





























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top