SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Pat) 53

N.L.UNTWALIA
Shrichand Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Mohan Singh – Respondent


Judgment

N.L.Untwalia, J.

1. In this case, by the order under revision, a decree passed tinder Sec.17 of the Arbitration Act, 1940 , (hereinafter referred to as the Act), has been set aside fay the Court below on the application of the opposite party purporting to be one under Order 9, Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure. The petitioner filed an application in the Court below on the 22nd November, 1960, under Sec.14 of the Act, which was registered as Miscellaneous Case No, 48 of 1960. Subsequently, it was converted into a title suit numbered as Title Suit 81 of 1960. Summons in the suit, meaning thereby the notice of the application under Sec.14, is said to have been served on the opposite party on the 27th December, 1960, as also on the Head Punch. The latter filed the Award in Court on the 10th March, 1961.

Thereafter, according to the petitioners case, as it appears from his civil revision application, notice of the filing of the Award was issued and was served on the opposite party on the 2nd April, 1961. In spite of the said service of notice of the filing of the Award, he did not appear and file any objection or an application to set aside the Award. Decree followed on the




Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top