Back
PATNA HIGH COURT
Anant Singh and G.N.Prasad JJ.
Lachhuman Munda
Versus
State Of Bihar
Criminal Appeal No. 618 of 1961 ;
Decided On : SEPTEMBER 11, 1963
CRIMINAL LAW - MURDER - CONFESSION - ADMISSIBILITY - EVIDENCE ACT, SECTIONS 24, 25, 27 - FIRST INFORMATION REPORT - SPLITTING UP - RELEVANCY - CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE - SUFFICIENCY.
Fact of the Case:
The appellant was convicted of murdering his sister-in-law, Badan Bhogtain. The prosecution's case was based on circumstantial evidence, including the appellant's first information report, in which he admitted to killing Badan, and the discovery of the murder weapon and other incriminating evidence at the scene of the crime.
Finding of the Court:
The court held that the appellant's first information report was admissible in evidence, except for the portion in which he confessed to the crime. The court found that the remaining portions of the report, which provided motive and opportunity for the crime, were admissible as admissions of relevant facts. The court also found that the discovery of the murder weapon and other incriminating evidence at the scene of the crime, on the pointing of the appellant, was admissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
Issues: 1. Whether the appellant's first information report was admissible in evidence. 2. Whether the discovery of the murder weapon and other incriminating evidence at the scene of the crime, on the pointing of the appellant, was admissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court held that the appellant's first information report was admissible in evidence, except for the portion in which he confessed to the crime. The court found that the remaining portions of the report, which provided motive and opportunity for the crime, were admissible as admissions of relevant facts. The court relied on Sections 17, 19, 20, 21, 24, 25, and 27 of the Evidence Act in reaching this conclusion. 2. The court held that the discovery of the murder weapon and other incriminating evidence at the scene of the crime, on the pointing of the appellant, was admissible under Section 27 of the Evidence Act. The court found that the appellant had submitted to the custody of the police by appearing at the police station and making his statement voluntarily. The court also found that the evidence was discovered in consequence of information received from the appellant.
Final Decision: The court dismissed the appellant's appeal and upheld his conviction for murder.
Anant Singh, J.
1. By his order dated the 7th June, 1961, the Second Additional Judicial Commissioner of Ranchi has convicted and sentenced to life imprisonment under section 302 of the Indian Penal Code the appellant for the murder of one unmarried girl named Badam Bhogtain, the sister of Birsa Pradhan (P. W-5) of village Hessel, Police station Khunti in the district of Ranchi. The appellant is also alleged to be of the same place, his house being 20 to 25 steps away from that of Birsa. The appellant has filed this appeal from jail.
2. The appellant had worked as Dhanaar (domestic servant) for one year till Majh of 1960 and during that period, he lived in the house of Birsa, where his sister Badan Bhogtain also lived. She was murdered sometime during night intervening the 15th April and 16th April 1960, and the crime was brought to light by the appellant himself at about 6.15 A. M. on the 16th of April 1960 when he appeared in person at the Khunti Police Station before the Deputy Superintendent of Police, Shri Devi Charan Sinha (P. W. 11), who was when the officer-in-charge, being on training. The appellant produced a balua (txt. 1) and gave his statement (Ext. 1/2) which was treated as the first information report. The Deputy Superintendent of Police registered a case and took up the investigation of the case. He found the handle of the balua broken. He noticed some blood stains on the blade and handle with a hair sticking to it. He noticed blood stains also on his dhoti (Ext. VI) and Gamchha (Ext. VII) which the appellant had on his person. He also noticed injuries on his finger. He seized the balum (Ext. 1) with its handle, dhoti (Ext. VI) and Gamcliha (Ext. VII) and prepared a seizure list (Ext. 2/2) in presence of Prafulla Kumar Bhagat (P. W. I) and Chandra Mohan Mishra (P. W. 6). The Deputy Superintendent also prepared an injury report in respect of the injuries on the fingers of the appellant.
3. The Deputy Superintendent left the police station at about 8 A. M. along with the appellant in a truck, and from village Pelot they went on foot. The appellant took the Deputy Superintendent to a ditch which was situate in a solitary place on the boundary of village Mahil, about one mile from village Hessel. Some local witnesses were called, and among them were Sahdeo Manjhi (P. W. 2) and Sidam Dam (P. W. 9). The appellant pointed out the dead body of Badan Bhogtain which was lying in a ditch and which was not visible from the village path which was at a distance of about 60 yards. The Deputy Superintendent, who will be hereinafter referred to as D. S. P. held an inquest over the dead body and prepared an inquest report (Ext. 4/2). He found the wearing apparel of the deceased lying around there, all besmeared with blood. Five pieces of bamboo, each about one finger in length, were also found scattered near the dead body. The earth near it was stained with bfood. The D. S. P. scraped and seized from two places blood-stained earth and also seized the bamboo pieces and prepared a seizure list (Ext. 3/2). On going back to the thana, he found on experiment that four of the bamboo pieces, which he had picked up from near the deady (sic) body, exactly fitted in when combined with the broken end of the handle of the axe that had been produced by the appellant earlier at the thana. One of the bamboo pieces slightly covered the sliced portion of the handle of (sic) and that piece had blood-like stains over it. The appellant was kept in thann lock up; but at about 7.15 P. M. he escaped from the police station whers he was taken out for answering the call of nature. He was, however, rearrested on the 18th April I960 The D. S. P. examined some witnesses, and on the 2nd May, 1960, he sent in a sealed box the blood stained articles to the Chemical Examiner. They were (1) small pieces of bamboo handle. (2) scrapings from bamboo handle. (3) earth. (4) earth, (5) sari cuttings, (6) dhoti cuttings, (7) towel cuttings (8) sample blood of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
