SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1963 Supreme(Pat) 26

G.N.PRASAD
State Of Bihar – Appellant
Versus
Polo Mistry – Respondent


Judgment

G.N.Prasad, J.

1. This is an appeal by the State Government against an order of acquittal recorded by the learned Judicial Magistrate under Sec.251-A(11) of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The circumstances in which the order under appeal came to be recorded are, briefly, these.

2. On the basis of a police report, the respondents, who are 22 in number, were summoned to take their trial for offences under Sections 147, 148, 448, 325 and 324 of the Indian Penal Code. The case was transferred to the learned Judicial Magistrate, Mr. M. Mustafa, for trial. On the 13th June, 1961, the learned Magistrate framed charges against the various respondents under Sets. 147, 148, 323, 324 and 325/34 of the Indian Penal Code, to which the respondents pleaded not guilty. On the same day, the learned Magistrate ordered sommonses to be issued for the appearance of the prosecution witnesses on the 17th, 18th and the 19th July, 1961, in equal batches. No prosecution witness, however, appeared in response to the summons on any of these three dates, in spite of the fact that the service report of the summonses had been received. On the 19th July, 1961, the learned Magistrate proceeded to acquit t





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top