SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 88

TARKESHWAR NATH, H.MAHAPATRA
Ram Udgar Singh – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court, C. N. Division – Respondent


Judgment

H.Mahapatra, J.

1. This is an application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by Ramudgar Singh against the Presiding Officer, Labour Court of Criota Nagpur Division at Ranchi, the Bihar Electricity Board through its Chairman Sri R. Mishra and Md. Arif, Personnel Officer (Labour), Bihar State Electricity Board. The petitioner was an employee under the Bihar Electricity Board. He was dismissed by the Electrical Superintending Engineer, Ranchi Electrical Circle, on the 4th of December 1962 from his service. The Electricity Board which was constituted under the Indian Electricity (Supply) Act made an application under Sec.33 (2) (b) of the Industrial Disputes Act to the Labour Court for approval of their action of dismissal of the petitioner, On the 3rd of July, 1963, opposite party No. 3, Md. Arif, Personnel Officer of the Bihar State Electricity Board, filed his appearance on behalf of the employer before the Labour Court. The General Secretary of the Bihar State Electricity Supply Workers Union was authorised under the provisions made under Sec.36 (1) (a) to represent the petitioner before the Labour Court. He raised an objection against Md. Arifs appear


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top