SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 41

A.B.N.SINHA, S.C.MISRA
Haridas Ghosh – Appellant
Versus
Thakur Jogendra Nath Sahdeo – Respondent


Judgment

S.C.Misra, J.

1. These two appeals are by the decree-holders. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 300 of 1960 arises out of the decree passed in Mortgage Suit No. 31 of 1931 and Miscellaneous Appeal No. 301 of 1960 out of the decree passed in Mortgage Suit No. 30 of 1931. The mortgagee S. C. Roy, held a mortgage executed in his favour by Thakur Jagat Udai Nath Sahdeo, father of respondent Thakur Jogendra Nath Sahdeo, on the 17th of February, 1922, by which he mortgaged eight annas interest in village Hasag and under the second he mortgaged sixteen annas interest in village Nilma. Preliminary decree was passed in both the suits on the 28th of January, 1932, and final decree on the 19th of November, 1932. On the 9th of February, 1933, two execution cases were started at the instance of the decree-holders of the decretal dues. It appears, however, that during the pendency of the execution proceedings, the judgment-debtor prayed for relief under the Chotanagpur Encumbered Estates Act, 1876 (Act 6 of 1876). The prayer was allowed and the execution cases were accordingly stayed sine die on the 17th of February, 1938.

The dues, however, of the appellant-decree-holders, could not be satisfied





Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top