SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1964 Supreme(Pat) 149

H.MAHAPATRA, A.B.N.SINHA
Sudhansu Kanta – Appellant
Versus
Manindra Nath – Respondent


Judgment

Mahapatra, J.

1. This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against an order of the 1st Additional District Judge, Hazaribagh, refusing to appoint a receiver in respect of suit property which is 500 bighas of coal mining area in village Topa, police station Mandu in the district of Hazaribhagh. The appellant and the defendant-respondent were two partners of a partnership firm on the 12th of June 1957 when a registered instrument incorporating the agreement of partnership was executed by both of them for purposes of carrying on coal mining business. Plaintiff filed a suit on the 6th of September, 1962 for a declaration that by the deed of release which was executed by him on the 1st of July 1961 his interest in the partnership firm Topa colliery or his interest as a lessee in the suit property was not affected in any way. The other reliefs asked by him are the dissolution of the partnership business and for accounts of the firm and the mines from the defendant. Before the written statement was filed by the defendant, the plaintiff made an application on the 14th of August 1963 for appointment of a receiver alleging therein several acts of waste, negligence, damage, loss commit















































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top