H.MAHAPATRA, A.B.N.SINHA
Sudhansu Kanta – Appellant
Versus
Manindra Nath – Respondent
Mahapatra, J.
1. This appeal by the plaintiff is directed against an order of the 1st Additional District Judge, Hazaribagh, refusing to appoint a receiver in respect of suit property which is 500 bighas of coal mining area in village Topa, police station Mandu in the district of Hazaribhagh. The appellant and the defendant-respondent were two partners of a partnership firm on the 12th of June 1957 when a registered instrument incorporating the agreement of partnership was executed by both of them for purposes of carrying on coal mining business. Plaintiff filed a suit on the 6th of September, 1962 for a declaration that by the deed of release which was executed by him on the 1st of July 1961 his interest in the partnership firm Topa colliery or his interest as a lessee in the suit property was not affected in any way. The other reliefs asked by him are the dissolution of the partnership business and for accounts of the firm and the mines from the defendant. Before the written statement was filed by the defendant, the plaintiff made an application on the 14th of August 1963 for appointment of a receiver alleging therein several acts of waste, negligence, damage, loss commit
Arunachala Nadar V/s. State Of Madras
Benoy Krishna V/s. Satish Chandra
Lachhman Das V/s. Mt. Gulab Devi
M.E. Molla, Sons, Ltd. V/s. Official Assignee, Rangoon
Maritime Electric Co. Ltd. V/s. General Dairies Ltd.
Mineral Development Ltd. V/s. Union Of India
Mineral Development V/s. State Of Bihar
Mohd. Hanif Quareshi V/s. State Of Bihar
Muniammal V/s. Ranganatha Nayagar
Bishwanath Prasad V/s. National Coal Development Corporation (Private) Ltd.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.