SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Pat) 94

K.SAHAI, TARKESHWAR NATH
Sakhi Ram – Appellant
Versus
Presiding Officer, Labour Court – Respondent


Judgment

Sahai, J.

1. Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 306 of 1962 arises out of Minimum Wages Act Case No. 6 of 1961 before the Labour Court, and Miscellaneous Judicial Case No. 361 of 1962 arises out of Minimum Wages Art Case No. 22 of 1961 before the same Court. Both these cases have been taken up together because the Labour Court has disposed of both the cases by one judgment and also because the points involved in both are the same The applications, which were filed before the Labour Court, were both under Sec.20 of the Minimum Wages Act, 1948 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act unless the context shows otherwise). The Labour Court has upheld a preliminary objection taken by the opposite party, i.e., the management of the Motipur Zamindari Co. Private Ltd. (hereinafter to be referred to as the company), and has dismissed the applications.

2. It is necessary to mention some facts in order to appreciate the points which arise for consideration. There was a dispute between the management and the employees of the company. By notification No. III/DI-1000/ 57-13354, dated the 29th July, 1957, the Governor of Bihar referred the dispute between the management and the workmen to th














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top