SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1965 Supreme(Pat) 101

R.L.NARASIMHAM, R.J.BAHADUR
Hindustan General Electrical Corporation Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

Narasimham, J.

1. This is an application to quash the order of the Labour Court Ranchi dated the 39th December, 1961, in Reference case No. 3 of 1961, holding the termination of the services of Sri Padma Nabh Nola, respondent No. 3, by the petitioner to be illegal and unjustified and directing his reinstatement with full wages.

2. Respondent No. 3 joined the service of the petitioner as an Assistant Store-keeper on the 2nd August, 1956. On the 24th January 1959 he was called upon to explain certain shortages in the general section of the stores kept in his charge. He submitted his explanation, but that was not found to be satisfactory and then on the 2nd March, 1959 his services were terminated (Annexure A) in pursuance of Clause 11 (b) of the Service Rules prevailing in the petitioners office The Government of Bihar, on the 5th April. 1961 referred to the Labour Court (see Annexure C) the dispute relating to the question as to whether respondent No. 3 should be reinstated in service or else he should he otherwise compensated. In their order of reference (vide notification of the Department of Labour and Employment No. III/DI-6044/61-L 2203, dated the 5th April. 1961) the G













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top