SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1966 Supreme(Pat) 190

M.P.VARMA
Sahdul Mian Jan Mohammad Mian – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

M.P.Verma, J.

1. The plaintiff petitioner had brought Money Suit No. 32/1 of 1961/63 in the Court of the first Additional Munsif, Sasaram, on the allegation that he got a bale of cloth booked from Howrah on 27-7-60 to be delivered at Bhabhua Road railway station, both the stations lying within the jurisdiction of the Eastern Railway. This consignment was not delivered to the petitioner at all and thereby he suffered a loss of Rs. 952.87 Paise. He, therefore, save a notice under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act as well as Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code to the Union of India representing the railway administration. After the expiry of two months from the date of the notice, the above mentioned suit was filed.

2. The Union of India, representing the railway administration, contested the suit and one of the grounds taken was that no valid notice under Section 80 of the Civil Procedure Code had been served on them. As regards the non-delivery of the consignment, it was alleged that it was correctly despatched in a lot of 42 packages, but it was stolen from the running train between Burdwan and Durgapur railway stations and over this accident the railway administrati














Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top