SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

1968 Supreme(Pat) 90

B.N.JHA
Chand Prasad – Appellant
Versus
Lakshmi Singh – Respondent


Judgment

B.N.Jha, J.

1. The lower appellate Court framed the following issue:

"Is the plaintiffs sale deed dated 8th October, 1955 invalid in view of the provisions of Section 9 of the Bihar Privileged Persona Homestead Tenancy Act 1947 (hereinafter called the Act)" and remanded the case to the trial court for a finding on the above issue after giving opportunities to the parties to adduce evidence on this issue and to submit its finding to that court under the provisions of Order 41, Rule 25 of the Code of Civil Procedure, by its order dated June 24, 1967 and kept the record of the case in. its own file. The parties were also directed to get their pleadings amended on the above issue in the trial court within 15 days of that order. The plaintiff-respondents have come up in this Court against the aforesaid order of remand.

2. The main grievance of the petitioner is that the course adopted by the lower appellate court is wholly without jurisdiction. He submitted that the issue framed by the lower appellate court in this case did not arise on the pleadings of the parties. In this case, the Court below directed the parties to get their pleadings amended on the above issue in the trial


















Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top