SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Pat) 91

K.K.DUTTA, TARKESHWAR NATH
Sobharam Jokhiram – Appellant
Versus
Union Of India – Respondent


Judgment

Dutta, J.

1. This appeal arises put of a suit for recovery of compensation on account of shortage in delivery out of a consignment of 696 tins of cocoanut oil, which were booked from Trichur station of the Southern Railway to Sahebganj station of the Eastern Railway on 30-3-6C under Railway Receipt No. 470341 Invoice No. 13. The consignment reached Sahebganj Railway station on 22-4-60 and thereafter, open delivery was taken by the plaintiffs in whose favour the railway Receipt had been transferred. 289 tins of cocoanut oil were found to have become dented and leaky and out of these. 71 tins were found to be completely empty and the remaining 218 tins were partly empty and this had resulted in a shortage of 42 maunds 2 seers of cocoanut oil and aforesaid 289 tins were further alleged to have become completely unserviceable. The shortage, according to the plaintiff was caused by the negligence and misconduct on the part of the Southern Railway, South Eastern Railway and Eastern Railway and their servants. The plaintiff claimed to have duly issued notices under Section 77 of the Indian Railways Act and Section 80 of the Code of Civil Procedure to the General Managers of the af





































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top