SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1969 Supreme(Pat) 23

G.N.PRASAD
Badri Sah – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent


Judgment

1. The petitioner has been convicted under Sec.16(1)(a) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954, for having sold or stored for sale adulterated black pepper (Kali Mirch). The trial Court had sentenced him to undergo rigorous imprisonment for nine months and to pay a fine of Rs. 1,000, or, in default, to undergo rigorous imprisonment for two months more but, in appeal, the sentence has been reduced to rigorous imprisonment for three months and a fine of Rs. 500, or, in default, rigorous imprisonment for one month more.

2. It appears that, on the 31st January, 1963, the Health Officer of Motihari Municipality (P.W. 1) purchased a sample of black pepper from the grocery shop of the petitioner situated in Mohalla Meena Bazar; and, after observing the requisite formalities, he forwarded one packet of the article in sealed cover to the Public Analyst at Patna. The report of the Public Analyst was to the effect that the sample of the black pepper was adulterated. Accordingly, with the sanction of the Chairman of the Municipality, the present prosecution was instituted against the petitioner.

3. The petitioner put forward a defence that he had been falsely implicated by th













Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top