PATNA HIGH COURT
Anwar Ahmad and M.P.Varma JJ.
Bhadar Munda
Versus
Dhuchua Oraon
Appeal from Original Decree No. 449 of 1964 ;
Decided On : APRIL 18, 1969
LAND ACQUISITION ACT - SECTION 30 - REFERENCE - COMPENSATION - DIVISION OF COMPENSATION BETWEEN COMPETING CLAIMANTS - INTERPRETATION OF SALE DEEDS AND ASSESSMENT OF EVIDENCE OF POSSESSION.
Fact of the Case:
In a land acquisition proceeding, two claimants, Dhuchuwa Oraon and the appellants (representing the family of Chapru Munda), disputed the entitlement to compensation for a plot of land acquired by the Government. Dhuchuwa Oraon claimed ownership based on a registered sale deed from Lodo Munda, while the appellants claimed ownership through two registered sale deeds executed by Lodo Munda in favor of Jisting Munda (appellant's brother) and Chapru Munda.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the earliest sale deed was in favor of Jisting Munda for half of the plot, followed by a sale deed in favor of Dhuchuwa Oraon for the remaining half, and a later sale deed in favor of Chapru Munda for the entire plot. The court also found that the evidence of possession was inconclusive, with both parties presenting witnesses who testified to their respective claims.
Issues: 1. Interpretation of the sale deeds to determine the ownership of the plot. 2. Assessment of the evidence of possession to determine the entitlement to compensation.
Ratio Decidendi: 1. The court interpreted the sale deeds in chronological order, giving priority to the earliest sale deed in favor of Jisting Munda for half of the plot. The court held that Dhuchuwa Oraon could only claim the remaining half of the plot, as his sale deed was subsequent to Jisting Munda's. The court also held that Chapru Munda's sale deed, being the latest, did not confer any entitlement to the plot. 2. The court found that the evidence of possession was inconclusive, with both parties presenting witnesses who testified to their respective claims. The court held that neither party had provided compelling evidence to establish exclusive possession of the entire plot.
Final Decision: The court modified the award of the lower court, directing that half of the compensation money be paid to the appellants on behalf of the joint family (representing the family of Jisting Munda and Chapru Munda), and the other half be paid to Dhuchuwa Oraon.
M.P.Varma, J.
1. This appeal arises out of an award given by the Second Additional Judicial Commissioner of Chotanagpur at Ranchi in Land Acquisition Reference No. 300 of 1963, made to him under the provisions of Sec.30 of the Land Acquisition Act.
2. The short facts of the case are as follows: In village Bhusur, Police-station Ranchi, the Government acquired 380,92 acres of lands for Hatia township. Declaration No. 714 dated the 20th January, 1960 was published in the Bihar Gazette (Extraordinary) of the 21st January, 1960. In the present case, we are concerned with only 1.82 acres comprised within plot No. 520 of khata No. 17 (Tanr II land). When the Collector made his award in this case and fixed the amount of compensation at Rs. 11,553.36 paise, two claimants appeared before him to claim the compensation money. The first party was Chapru Munda, who later on died and was substituted by his two grandsons Bhadar Munda and Jainath Munda, through their guardian Jisting Munda a brother of Chapru Munda, who are the appellants in this case; and second party was Dhuchuwa Oraon, who is the respondent here.
The case of Dhuchuwa Oraon was that he had purchased this plot from Lodo Munda by virtue of a registered sale deed dated the 4th January, 1943 and since that date he was coming in possession of this land, and he paid rent to the State of Bihar after his name was mutated. Before that, he used to pay rent of Rs. 1-8-0 to Lodo Munda who used to grant him receipts. According to him, Chapru Munda or his heirs had no concern with the land in question. It was, therefore, submitted on his behalf that he was entitled to receive the entire compensation money which was to be paid for this acquisition.
3. On behalf of Jisting Munda it was asserted that he had purchased the eastern half of this plot (p. 92 acre) from Lodo Munda under a registered sale deed dated the 8th April, 1942 and had paid Rs. 100.00 as consideration for the same. Later on, his elder brother, Chapru Munda, purchased the remaining half from the said Lodo Munda under a registered sale deed dated the 26th January, 1945, Therefore, both these brothers held the entire plot since the time of their purchase. Jisting Munda was all along in Government service at Patna Secretariat and, in his absence. Chapru Munda used to look after the affairs. He, therefore, claimed the entire compensation money.
4. Before the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner, both parties filed their deeds of title and six witnesses were examined on behalf of Jisting Munda and eight witnesses were examined on behalf of Dhuchuwa Oraon. The learned. Additional Judicial Commissioner after a consideration of the evidence before him, came to the conclusion that Dhuchuwa Oraon was the competent person to receive the entire compensation money. Against this order, the present appeal has been filed.
5. Mr. A.K. Chatterjee, learned Counsel for the appellants, has argued that the learned Additional Judicial Commissioner had failed to take into consideration the various registered sale deeds which had been produced on behalf of the parties, and. therefore, he came to a wrong conclusion because of the non-consideration of those sale deeds. He further argued that it was not a proceeding under Sec.145 of the Code of Criminal Procedure that only the question of possession would be relevant. In the present case it has to be seen that there are three registered sale deeds, all executed by Lodo Munda on various dates.
The earliest document is Ext. 1/a dated the 8th April, 1942, by which Lodo transferred 0.92 acre of plot No. 520, along with another plot, to Jisting Munda for a sum of Rs. 100/-. So far as this plot is concerned, it was indicated in the sale deed that it was the half area towards the east. The second sale deed in point of time is Ext. B, dated the 4th January, 1943, by which Lodo transferred the entire area of this plot, namely, 1.84 acre, to Dhuchuwa Oraon for a sum of Rs. 73/- only. The third docum
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.