SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Pat) 162

B.D.SINGH
Harihar Prasad Sao – Appellant
Versus
Bhagwan Das – Respondent


Judgment

B.D.Singh, J.

1. This appeal & directed against the judgment and decree passed by the Judicial Commissioner of Chotanagpur, Ranchi, refusing to grant probate to the appellant, on his application dated the 31st July. 1963, under Sec.276 of the Indian Succession Act, 1922 in respect of the will executed on the 28th July, 1956, by Mukhlal Sao, one of the sons of Fulchand Sao, in favour of the appellant.

2. In order to appreciate the point which has been urged on behalf of the contesting respondent (respondent No. 4), it will be convenient to note below the genealogical table of the family of the appellant and the respondent: (See genealogical table on next page) According to the appellant, Mukhlal Sao, after duly executing the said will, died on the 24th October, 1956, at his residence at Upper Bazar. Ranchi, leaving behind respondents Nos. 1. 2, 3, 4 and 5 as his other near relations, and in the said will, Mukhlal had bequeathed his entire property in favour of the appellant. On behalf of Baijnath Sao (respondent No. 4) who is the main contestant caveat and written statement against the grant of probate of the will were filed in the Court below. It was stated, inter alia, the



































































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top