SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1970 Supreme(Pat) 142

G.N.PRASAD, A.B.N.SINHA, ANWAR AHMAD
Ram Chandra Srivastava – Appellant
Versus
Parsidh Narain Singh – Respondent


Judgment

G.N.Prasad, J.

1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution is directed against the order of the Collector of Patna (Respondent No. 7), in the first instance; that of the Commissioner, Patna Division, Patna (Respondant No. 6) on appeal, and finally that of the Member Board of Revenue (Respondent No. 5) in revision, concurrently rejecting a petition filed by the petitioners under Sec.16(3) of the Bihar Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling Area and Acquisition of Surplus Land) Act, 1961, Bihar Act 12 of 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). The relevant facts are not in dispute and may be briefly stated as follows:

2. On the 23rd October, 1962, two sale deeds were executed and registered in favour of Prasidh Narain Singh (Respondent No. 1); one for Rs. 400.00 by Swaroop Singh (Respondent No. 2, since deceased, and represented by his legal representatives) in respect of .03 acre of land comprised in plot No. 738 in village Sadabh, Pargana Masaurha police station Bikram, district Patna, and the other for Rs. 650.00 by Shrimati Lalmati Devi (Respondent No. 3) in respect of .03 acre of land in plot No. 738 as well as .10 acre of land in plot No. 2661 situa




































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top