SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

1971 Supreme(Pat) 91

S.P.SINHA, SHAMBHU PRASAD SINGH
Vulcan Ins. Co. Ltd. And Another – Appellant
Versus
Kongasari Lal Banerji And Another – Respondent


Judgment

1. These two appeals are directed against an award of a claims tribunal constituted under section 110 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939. The accident for which compensation has been awarded was by bus No. BRR 800. Miscellaneous Appeal No. 203 of 1968 is by the insurer and Miscellaneous Appeal No. 215 of 1968 is by the owner of the bus. They have been heard together, as they arise out of the same order, and are being disposed of by this judgment.

2. On 4th July, 1962, at about 10.30 a.m., Parbati Kumar Banerjee, a school teacher of the Jharia Raj School at Jharia, and his mother (A.W. 3) were standing at the place used as bus-stand near Dhanbad Railway Station. According to the claimant, the father of Parbati Kumar Banerjee, the aforesaid bus came there at high speed and crushed Parbati Kumar Banerjee in between that bus and another bus which was standing at the bus-stand, from before. A. W. 3 also received injuries. Parbati Kumar Banerjee was taken to the hospital at Dhanbad, but he died there. As stated earlier, the claim application was made by the father (A.W. 8) which is for his benefit as (well as for that of the mother of the deceased (A.W. 3).

3. The case of the appell









Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top