B.D.SINGH
Chandrahans Prasad Singh – Appellant
Versus
State Of Bihar – Respondent
B.D.Singh, J.
1. This application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, has been preferred by the sole petitioner against an order dated the 14th June. 1969 (Annexure 3) passed by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No. 3), whereby he has set aside the order of the Returning Officer (Respondent No. 2) and has accepted the second nomination paper filed by Respondent No. 4.
2. In order to appreciate the point involved in this application, it will be necessary to state briefly the facts. The petitioner as well as Respondent No. 4 were candidates for the election of the Mukhiya of the Dhrubgama Gram Panchayat in the District of Darbhanga. Respondent No. 4 had filed two nomination papers. On scrutiny both the nomination papers were rejected by Respondent No. 2. Aggrieved by the said order. Respondent No. 4 moved the Sub-Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No. 3) under Rule 23 (4) of the Bihar Panchayat Elections Rules, 1959 (hereinafter referred to as the Rules). The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, as mentioned earlier, accepted the, second nomination paper of Respondent No. 4, a copy of which the petitioner has filed as Annexure 2 to his application. In the im
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.